A veterinarian has since reacted.
Under the Sea Babyshower, Yanedaila captioned her post, adding: NOANIMALSWERE HARMED.
The fish are very much alive.
One thing Im passionate about is bringing my clients visions to life SEAMLESSLY and I DID THAT!
Her explanation didnt appease online critics, as a person commented: Yes art is art.
But animal abuse is still animal abuse.Dogcat bird and still fish.
This vision couldve still slayed with fake fish.
they are not the same nor can they be.
Someone else penned: Absolutely disgusting and you should never work again.
Using animals as an accessory for some trashy tacky *ss dress is appalling.
Another person chimed in: yo maam, dont keep a living creature in a cup-sized home.
Its like living in a one-room house.
Pooing where you sleep.
Free all creatures so they can remain in their favorite habitat.
Fish have a special organ for sensing water movement around them, and this would be overwhelming to them.
Bored Pandahas contacted Yanedaila for comment.
The controversialfashion designdrew concerns, with many people accusing the designer of inciting animal abuse.
Fish are not props, a reader commented
Thanks!
Check out the results:
