Justin Bieberwas flown into India to perform for the celebrations at a reported cost of $10 million.

She also wore another red ensemble with a long red veil for Sundays wedding festivities.

Not supposed to wear red to a wedding in India.

Article image

One said, Wearing red to an Indian wedding is diabolical….

It look very cheep [sic] and notIndianat all!

Only the bride wears red… said yet another.

“Not Supposed To Wear Red”: Kim Kardashian Sparks Controversy At Indian Billionaire’s Wedding

Not supposed to wear red to a wedding in India.

In our culture, it means new beginnings, passion, and prosperity.

Red also represents the Hindu goddess Durga, who symbolizes new beginnings andfeminine power.

“Not Supposed To Wear Red”: Kim Kardashian Sparks Controversy At Indian Billionaire’s Wedding

In comparison, the wedding of Princess Diana and Prince Charlescost$110 million.

“Not Supposed To Wear Red”: Kim Kardashian Sparks Controversy At Indian Billionaire’s Wedding

“Not Supposed To Wear Red”: Kim Kardashian Sparks Controversy At Indian Billionaire’s Wedding

“Not Supposed To Wear Red”: Kim Kardashian Sparks Controversy At Indian Billionaire’s Wedding

“Not Supposed To Wear Red”: Kim Kardashian Sparks Controversy At Indian Billionaire’s Wedding

“Not Supposed To Wear Red”: Kim Kardashian Sparks Controversy At Indian Billionaire’s Wedding

“Not Supposed To Wear Red”: Kim Kardashian Sparks Controversy At Indian Billionaire’s Wedding

“Not Supposed To Wear Red”: Kim Kardashian Sparks Controversy At Indian Billionaire’s Wedding