Share
Todays Original Poster (OP) and her husband were simply trying to find a new home.
However, for the price, it was something they were interested in pursuing.
Unbeknownst to them, the home owner was a social mediainfluencer, and here comes the kicker.
The influencer accused them of being mean and nasty people, claiming she would never sell to them.
Worse, the video clearly showed their faces.
While theirrealtoris mortified by the situation, the damage has already been done.
It includes spreading false or harmful content to damage someones reputation.
They explain that it requires proper permissions when using intellectual property, including images and personaldata.
According to them, posting content without consent isnt just a privacy violation, it can also fuel harassment.
Beyond social media, privacy concerns extend to real estate transactions.
Discover NC Homespointsout that while video surveillance may be legal, recording audio without consent often isnt.
They advise sellers against recording conversations, as many laws prohibit eavesdropping through electronicdevices.
What do you think about this situation?
Do you think influencers should be held legally responsible for content that harms others?
We would love to hear your thoughts!
Check out the results:
