To be more specific, the fact that his roommate was constantly stealing it but never confessing.
So, to catch him and make him pay, the author came up with a perfect revenge plan.
And lets just say that it involved cheese, vomit, and screaming.
As I see it, conflicts are always related to values and needs.
She says if it were just about food, the compartments and other things like that would solve it.
The thing about Tyler is that he hates mozzarella.
Apparently,cheesesthat have higher moisture content are more prone to be contaminated withlisteria, which causes food poisoning.
At the same time, it could have also beenmold, some kind ofcontaminationduring processing/distribution, or whatever else.
To be frank, it doesnt really matter, except that the man has hated mozzarella cheese ever since.
For instance, the kind with mozzarella, just like the one in todays story.
He went over there and saw that the man had eaten the hot dogs with mozzarella.
He not only screamed, but he puked on his bed, too.
Naturally, after this incident, the rest of the roommates couldnt stop teasing the man.
For thepranksvictim, it wasnt so funny.
He accused the OP of lying about the fact that hot dogs didnt contain any cheese.
Even though the name itself contains the word lying, not everyone agrees that it is.
Its for sure dishonest, deceptive behavior, but not necessarily lying.
However, the results of it can differ depending on the seriousness of the information.
Lets take the mozzarella incident as an example.
Yes, the OP not disclosing the hot dogs hadcheesein them was him not being deceptive.
Simultaneously, Tyler shouldnt have taken food that wasnt his, whether he thought it was cheeseless or not.
So, in a way, he paid forstealing.
His prank was a perfect way to make the roommate regret stealing food without putting his health in danger.
Yes, his bedsheets might have been destroyed by vomit, but besides that, everyone came out fine.
Check out the results:
